@Glomoro Antagonists aren't necessarily "the bad guys", though, and if stating facts, analysing evidence, and opining disagreement – even flourished with exaggeration for emphasis – is what you wish to have understood as "antagonising" then I see no reason to have it affect that cordiality you...
@Glomoro Again, I have no problems with mistakes. They're accidents that happen. But to have an entire production chain with dedicated people who are expected to know about what they're being "employed" for (because that's what they are employed for in the first place) … There is only so much...
@Myon No problem, thank you for asking.
The issue is that it's not just an accidental misspelling but a conscious disregard for wordbreak rules. Rules that someone didn't just pull out of nowhere but became codified agreements over what and how things read the best. Reading this chapter, you'll...