@throughstars: It's actually a sign of closeness and holding them dear that he mixes the names. There was even a study done on that phenomenon: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/01/16/509353565/when-the-brain-scrambles-names-its-because-you-love-them?t=1608481842067
Nice indeed. If I remember right the Master of the thousand faced Prince wanted to spend a night with our hero. Looking forward to that scene, when he has to play himself :D
Ah right, I assumed your standpoint was logical, but after reading it again it actually wasn't: Some slaveowners are/were fine guys, but some are/were evil, because they're/were slaveowners.
So my bad really, I should have noticed that flaw way earlier.
Try that yourself :)
I said you should consider yourself evil, not that you are evil. Because we don't know if there will be some X found someday that clearly only evil people can do, but we think is entirely normal and fine to do today.
@Rgal: But it is exactly your statement?
"Yours: "is that, you cannot be evil for doing x, if the society in that time and place does not deem it to be evil."
Mine: "no, you can""
So yours is: One can be evil for doing x, even if the society in that time and place does not deem it to be evil...
@Rgal But there were also often rules to make sure not too many slaves got released. Not talking about that even once freed, the former slaves often still had certain restrictions and obligations towards their former master. Bancrupting yourself if you suddenly lost most of your workforce and a...
@Rgal: "You don't need "modern conscience" to realise that if you wouldn't want to have bad things happen to you, other people aren't likely to want them happen to themselves either. Which is why abolotionism existed back when all the popular kids thought slavery was a-OK."
Abolotionism took a...
Is it really so hard to accept that there is no absolute bad and good in the world? Because if so, then as long as there are still bad things happening, anyone who knows of them and doesn' try his best to stop or change them should be considered evil too?
As we have the topic of slavers here...
I think it's good enough: Divine Protection just resurrects, but doesn't stop aging. So it isn't immortality.
Her own immortality works really good and there can be quite a few possible explanations why it's not the best thing for her, just because she calls it dementia doesn't mean it is normal...
Everyone saying here how Aria is the better person because of using her own effort and such, when she just called Daddy to help her the second she got news of the delegation and the role she should be playing.
Both Princess candidates heavily relie on others, just we get shown on who Rachel...