Search results

@comeonnow0 To continue the history, we then have to look at how comeonnow0 tries to frame the narrative, in order to justify the stance that Tina should have been failed. Previously he said to pass Jere's condition was "show me enough skill to make me believe you are capable of joining the...

@comeonnow0 So here we start with a (hopefully) brief history of this discussion, and how it went from a discussion of whether or not it was reasonable to say Jere made the right evaluation and had the wrong response to that right evaluation, to one side abandoning the discussion of merit to...

@comeonnow0 I do have support, from facts and evidence. Things that have yet to support you, and things that seem completely foreign to you, at this point. The dictionary proved me to be correct, and that your accusation that I lied about what you said was actually the lie. Red225 stated that...

@comeonnow0 As I said, with every post of yours, you expose yourself as more of a liar and a fraud. You continue to show that your claims of wanting to "be considerate" in the thread before were a lie, and that your claims about yourself can't be trusted. You just want to portray yourself in a...

@comeonnow0 I'm curious what your endgame is at this point. It has been a long time since you admitted that your posts were no longer substantive, so you aren't trying to win with substance. You recently admitted you don't think it is about truth, so you aren't trying to win with honesty. It...

@comeonnow0 I wonder just how long you plan to continue debasing yourself like this. For somebody that claimed to care what others think, you have to realize you just look pitiful when you do this. It really does show that you are incapable of furthering the debate with any substance. You just...

@comeonnow0 Ironic that you now mock the idea that it "is totally about what is true", when the most repeated accusation of me is that I am "lying repeatedly". You now show you don't care about what is true, only about insisting you are right. Thus you calling me a liar wasn't about truth (as...

@comeonnow0 You still like to pretend this is a popularity contest, like truth is decided by a vote. But all of the people you say "agreed" with you, did so very early on, with the latest one being after only 3 of your comments (and even then their comment could have been based on your very...

@comeonnow0 You are the one that has been proven to be lying multiple times, even in blatant circumstances. So when you accuse me of lying, your credibility is gone. Your recent change in tone (which seems to be in direct response to realize you'd been caught in an obvious lie) makes you look...

@comeonnow0 Since I haven't been repeating lies and making things up, I don't look pathetic. When it comes to repeating lies, I just proved, yet again, that you were lying, and doubled and tripled down on an obvious lie. I've proved that you will lie, to not admit being wrong. Since you've...

@comeonnow0 Since you have claimed to care about what others think, do you really think that the people reading your replies at this point think you are anything other than petty and bitter? Why not stop replying if this is all you can muster at this point?

@comeonnow0 Anyone who read it and uses English would understand that to be your stated goal, yes. I showed you to be a liar based on a summary of your statement, you doubled down and accused me of lying for saying you lied. So I quoted you, providing more proof that you lied, you tripled down...

@comeonnow0 "I'm trying to get" means that is your goal. You don't have to say: "This is my goal" using those specific words to mean something is your goal. The definition of goal: "the object of a person's ambition or effort; an aim or desired result" Of note: "the object of a person's...

@comeonnow0 You said: "I called you out because I'm trying to get you to respect other people and not bother them. If someone is loud and bothering people and one person tells the loud person to be quiet" "You are being like the loud person". So you said your goal was to get me to "be quiet" and...

@comeonnow0 The evidence of who lied does speak for itself. You say your goal is to get me to shut up, but I stated that I wouldn't keep posting by myself if I wasn't replying. Yet you continue to post. Which means you lied about your goal. You said what you thought would make you sound better...

@comeonnow0 I didn't lie, as I said they disagreed with you (which you admit) and that meant they had to view another view as "more valid" (because if they viewed your view to be the "more valid" view, they would clearly concede that you were correct). Also, you said them not replying before was...

@comeonnow0 You continue to project. You are the one who lied. The fact that you only do personal attacks without substance behind them (and have admitted your posts lack substance) shows that. red225 made it clear they don't want to be part of the discussion, but still disagreed with your...

@comeonnow0 If you could admit error so well, other than an obvious typo, you would have conceded your arguments have no substance by now. The only time you will admit error is when you think you can dismiss your error as being of no consequence. Any time there is consequence to your error, you...

@comeonnow0 I was notified by the second post, but since you've typed it correctly so far, it seems odd you misspelled it once, even after editing the post. Another post of yours with nothing of substance, just personal attacks. You also accuse me of making things up when you are still the one...

@comeonnow0 Oh, wow, two comments this time (though one with my name misspelled so it didn't trigger a notification). "Explicit evidence"? So if a guy accused of bank robbery says: "I didn't do it" then it is "explicit evidence" that he didn't do it? You say you don't, but your solution would...