1-Star Rating

[ImJustTesting]

Never saw anyone so proud to announce they lack a working brain...

 

[Tamerlane]

Rip the manga of dead creators

 

[Hornyturtle]

Is this the first time you've encountered someone less intelligent than you?

 

[Teasday]

1-10 was a mistake and I warned Holo

 

[Richman]

So the ratings should be 2-9?

 

[pandascepter]

☺

 

[gomichandesu]

Did
did they like, at least mean "incomplete" as in an axed manga that never got a true ending and never will?

 

[pandascepter]

@gomichandesu
thanks

 

[gomichandesu]

@pandascepter
but of course, anytime friend, happy to be of help!

 

[pandascepter]

@gomichandesu
really, im being grateful.....

also, have you seen the live action of Teen Mom?

edit:
yes, me neither.

 

[Greenfrost]

Actually, is a manga getting axed the same as getting cancelled?

 

[pandascepter]

@Greenfrost
no, its different. If the manga get cancelled then the manga get cancelled and if the manga get axed then the manga get axed. The manga that has axed on the comment thread is as same as the cancelled manga has.

TL;DR
Yesn't but the opposite.

 

[gomichandesu]

@pandascepter
lol I just had no idea what you were thanking me for, I love you pando, really.
And nope, I was aware there was a drama for it though. My ADD's been rough lately, can't sit through a video longer than 10 minutes these days.

@Greenfrost
To better translate pandanese lol, the difference (in my mind at least) is a cancelled manga usually isn't as abrupt as an axe. They get a chance to wrap things up, though usually within only 1-2 chapters so the ending is hyper rushed and overall shit. Axed mangos just, cease. From whatever point they're at, that's it. And there will never be more.
But, people here on MD like to throw around the term "axed" for a lot of things so god knows what the general understanding of the term is.

 

[Ivegotnolife]

You do realize, I've never felt the urge to rate a mango.
So I don't get the obsession some users have with revamping the score system.

 

[wowfucktron]

@ivegotnolife

So I don't get the obsession some users have with revamping the score system

Scoring systems using a large numerical range are unreliable and easily gamed, not to mention misleading.

Some people get elitist over scores: MAL's FMA fuccbois (your manga and anime are shit and so are you).
Some people only watch things with high scores: Roger Ebert's audience (despite the fact that he hated that segment of his audience).
The rating scale of 1-10 do not work, especially when the real average (5) means below average. 7 usually means dead average on this scale. (7=5, unga bunga)

One of the goals of wanting to revamp these stupid rating systems is to just not bother with numerical ambiguity as they cause all sorts of problems.

 

[Teddy]

This is why we have defaultbro quotes

 

[bigtiddyoneesan]

Numerical scoring works in most cases, I'd say. I try to rate objectively (as possible lol), and I usually end up rating things one to two points lower than the scores aggregated on sites. For the actually low scored ones, the score difference between my scoring and the site's scoring is usually much wider.

There was this thread from a while back where I wrote my doctoral thesis on scoring.