@Zakyrie, you yourself used the word "triggered" to describe your response to a character you don't find attractive being suggested as such, and then went into so much detail talking about women’s bodies and what makes them attractive, and what ISN’T attractive, and just tossing the word “attractive” all over the place lest we forget that we must only value women in terms of their attractiveness (to you), that I just had to assume you were indignant. It's not that you have a preference - which is fine - it's that you were so offended when your preference wasn't catered to that you had to rant publicly about it. It shows a certain entitlement that I found quite entertaining.
You're not mad that standards of beauty persist and that women must conform to them, it’s just that you want them to conform in a way that’s pleasing to you. You say very little about how women themselves can suffer by trying to be thin, but endlessly ruminate over the fact that this pursuit makes them unattractive (god forbid). I mean, thanks for tossing in a cursory "this is unhealthy" when pressed (though, of course it came with a side of "bodily disfigurement" and curves being "stripped away" because, again, let us not forget that the true tragedy of eating disorders is that it makes women total unbangable uggos).
This laser focus on what's attractive demonstrates a world view that centres what women are to those who find them desirable over what needs, preferences, interior lives women themselves have.
So, I don't take issue with your side eye at women starving themselves (I agree that sucks!), it's that your reasons for it are shallow and objectifying.
4 paragraphs about how sad/concerning it is that women may jeopardize their health in pursuit of narrow, unattainable standards? Fine, and I will cosign!
“Let me pontificate for 4 paragraphs about what I, (presumably) a man, find attractive in a woman!” No thanks, bro.
