Liking lolicon = paedophilia?

Liking lolicon = paedophilia?

  • Yes

    Votes: 46 40.7%
  • No

    Votes: 67 59.3%

  • Total voters
    113
  • Poll closed .
images
 
Imo the fine line between "pedo" and "lolicon" lies in the fact that loli drawings aren't real people.
So I guess it's fine as long as a lolicon doesn't think about real children.
Also it's weird to call irl kids "loli" anyway.
 
The moment you call a real kid loli or shota, you have bruised the line between real and fiction. At that point you can't deny you need help.

Also lolis are for petting, you degenerates
 
@solstice258
Cw for mentions of CP in spoiler
Yeah I completely agree. Calling actual kids lolis is rly weird because the term has been deteriorated over the years, thus making me a little uncomfy when used on actual kids. (I saw some artist on twitter once use loli to describe a kid they referenced for their art and I just 🤮)
As long as the artist doesn't reference actual CP/make it look hyper realistic I really don't see the problem with people liking or drawing it.
 
Id love a good distinction between terminologies, but according to what Ive learned lolicon has the worst jumble of definitions. No matter though, its still connotates borderline to sexual acts. So yeah, its bound to go under peadophilia.

Also, if you lump in admiration to obsession, wouldnt that bring up a different line of offense already.
 
I'd like to equate something, if that's alright with you folks. I feel like this tends to get lost in the trees, but I find it is important. I feel like actions matter a lot in this conversation, not only that but being able to separate fantasy and reality.

There are some really weird fucking people in this world, there are people who jerk their weens to literal guro porn, but I doubt they themselves would want to , well, I don't know, gut someone in real life and jerk off using their intestines as a sex toy. Just like I don't believe liking violent content makes you a violent person, or liking homoerotic stories makes you yourself a homosexual, I believe a large emphasis here needs to be placed on separating reality from fiction.

But no yeah if you're over in a corner staring at little girl from your window in real life you're a fucking weirdo.
 
In my opinion no, but on the other hand 80% of lolicons are possibly the most annoying people imaginable so they still deserve to get ridiculed. Lolicons are their own breed of retardation like most weird fetish communities online.
 
Easy for me to say no, seeing that I like loli a lot, but really hate children.
 
Between irl and drawings, I like the drawings, I hate the irl, the bad kids at least, especially the kind that disrespect you. I hate them with a passion.
 
Can any of you lolicon even jerk to real pedo porn though? Personally I barely ever get turned on by real porn and doubt even more I could to real life child.
And yeah, LO is my daily food I pretty much nut to loli most of the time.
 
who cares really? if something can be easily mistaken for something else, i just don't watch it. It's not worth it.
Internet is weird, there are plenty of other stuff to be weird about but less controversial. So, even if it's a masterpiece, I pass.

Now, if somebody would argue with me that almost all manga characters can be considered underage (ecci school life, isekais, etc.. ) and therefore pedo materials, i would say: ok, you can tell me all about it when we will both be in hell, for now, GTFO.
Sometimes people try to project their depraved thoughts onto you even if that thought never crossed your mind before they stated it.
 
@hazzack
hush, you're no 5401.
Nah bro, I believe immortalartisan is (insert age). Why, you ask?
>be me, le epic immortalartisan
>state my age on public forum
>get mad when other people mention my age

Clear as day, fam.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top