why does everything need to be foreshadowed for you? Having foreshadowing is cool but not having it isn't a vice. At the very least, there's no contradictions with the added information.
Kids will care, they won't be able to explain why they don't like it, and it doesn't outright ruin the story like a certain other Shounen I can think of, but they will care. Kids are unknowledgeable not stupid. In the words of Mr. Plinkett "you may not have noticed it, but your brain did." If kids had no standards and only liked things randomly, there's no reason any particular story would be more popular than another. One Piece is very obviously better written than this, and it gets better praise for it.But, to be honest, I think you're being a little too harsh. Yes, this is a shonen, so the target demographic are young boys. But people of all ages read shonen manga, and companies are more than aware of that. Maybe kids won't get the reference, but what you're saying implies that most kids would even really care about that.
They'll be able to verbalize to themselves as adults their feeling of confusion overwhy Soi suddenly has a trumpet, but they noticed as children. And there's no guarantee that a Japanese adult will ever read Ars Goetia in their life.It's only when they grow up and perhaps give the series a reread that they'll wonder why Soi suddenly has a trumpet. Then they'll come across the Ars Goetia.
At no point did I imply otherwise. References are cool, I like them a lot. It makes world building easier and makes it more rewarding for those who read other works. References should not nor can they replace foreshadowing or proper storytelling. You should be able to have both good foreshadowing and good references. There's no reason they should be mutually exclusive. Again, while cool, and a nice reference to know, that doesn't excuse the lack of foreshadowing.Just cause it's a shonen manga doesn't mean that it can't have bonus references for adults.
Sure, we may have been at the school past 5 PM a few times, but at those times, we've always been in some other plot-relevant event. Do you really think the author would pull away from reading with Amelie to point out something right out of left field?
There's a simple resolution to this, he stops reading when he hears the trumpet. "Oh Amelie, do you hear that? That's the pixie, I guess story time is over for the day." Did you see what I did there? I integrated foreshadowing without taking away from the subject of the scene. He only had to do this once.dditionally, the way the characters act when Purson plays means that this is a common occurrence, almost like a bell ringing on the hour to tell us the time. Why would the author pull us away from whatever's happening to make a point of this common occurrence unless it was directly related to the plot
You have it fundamentally backwards. It's because it was directly related to the plot now that it should have been mentioned earlier. If Iruma showed up next chapter with Hell's Tuba, the most powerful and beautiful music instrument in the underworld that will guarantee make their musical performance a success, would you find that an asspull? Why? Is it because there was no mention of it previous?dditionally, the way the characters act when Purson plays means that this is a common occurrence, almost like a bell ringing on the hour to tell us the time. Why would the author pull us away from whatever's happening to make a point of this common occurrence unless it was directly related to the plot
You're arguing it was impossible for the author to foreshadow the pixie but not for him to foreshadow Purson himself? That's pretty self-contradictory.In conclusion, stop bitching and enjoy the story. Not everything needs to be hidden in plain sight (as Purson himself was), and not everything **can** be foreshadowed either.