@Plykiya
The new reader has a max preload of 20 pages
I don't know about innovative, I took cues from Japanese online readers and old software comics readers like CDisplayEX and HoneyView. You're right in that it's a move away from the old basic "press image to go forward" html readers that some sites have been clinging on to for the better part of a decade.@vwgacc123 posted:
Changing formats and buttons that are universal to all reader sites just so devs can feel like they're being innovative?
Yeah, I can understand your use case. There's really nothing about the new reader itself that wouldn't allow you to preload every single page, since the max number is just a variable I could change any time. When I asked Holo yesterday he figured 20 would be good, if you want to convince him otherwise I'd suggest you do that. Just remember that we're trying to move away from people hammering away at the site and slowing things down with excessive requests, which is why it's kind of unfortunate that people are still going back to the legacy long strip instead suggesting ways to make the new reader work for them.@Harry_Dong posted:
Oh cool, that wasn't the case while I was still using it. Nonetheless, I still read a lot of monthlies (32+ pages), sometimes even 45 pages. It's not so easy to reset my internet when I'm on the toilet with my tablet.
To be fair the thumbnails for that are not even a megabyte in total and if you've downloaded them once they'll stay cached a long time since that list doesn't change often. Bandwidth should be the least of your concerns with it.@Nick86 posted:
Oh, i notice now that you guys moved the "Featured titles" at the bottom, imo, is just a useless part of the main page, it just consume bandwidth
@Nick86 posted:
Ah yes, the "show all" still not a permanent setting, maybe there is a reason for this?
Nah, I actually think it's a good idea to keep the new reader as the default, with the same number of preload images as is or even lower, because as you mentioned, it should keep the site from bogging down; in theory at least. It should be fine for most users. I'm probably a unique case as most people I know either have fast or slow internet, but few rarely complain about high frequency of disconnections unless they live in the middle of nowhere, or limited to one ISP having a stranglehold monopoly in their area like they do in my area with aging infrastructure.@Teasday
When I asked Holo yesterday he figured 20 would be good, if you want to convince him otherwise I'd suggest you do that. Just remember that we're trying to move away from people hammering away at the site and slowing things down with excessive requests, which is why it's kind of unfortunate that people are still going back to the legacy long strip instead suggesting ways to make the new reader work for them.
1. You're looking at the defunct mangadex.com, not mangadex.org.@crazybars posted:
Uh... remember when I said people would give up learning how to use your new Mangareader? Apparently a lot of people just up and stopped using the site entirely. You guys are bleeding users unbelievably fast.
We'll try something in the near future (as in today hopefully) to improve reader support for old browsers, we'll have to see how it goes. No idea why you couldn't tap on the titles in the follows, especially since the manga page listings should use the exact same html for their chapter listings. There's nothing special about how the links on follows page work, they're perfectly normal links.@Thegreatthomas posted:
@teasday I switched back to legacy single page because the new reader won't load on my phone. I'd switch back to the whole previous version if I could because I can't tap on chapter titles or names in my follows, and have to go through the manga's main page to select any chapter at all, so there's definitely reasons outside just aversion to change