Q.E.D - Vol. 27 Ch. 53 - Burden Of Proof

Wow. This one really kept me on edge. It also reminded me of an old movie called 12 Angry Men.
 
My only complaint is we weren't told before he was a host, so how did Touma know?
 
@Voyager it should have been included among the list of professions in pg16, when the Prosecutor makes his opening statement, but it got missed out, sorry about that.

Fixed now.
 
Hahah, I admit I didn't come up with the background reasoning Touma had to explain all of the evidence, but I was thinking the whole time "the defendant is most likely guilty, but in a US court of law, the prosecution's case was so flimsy that they should've been found not guilty".
 
Ugh, I kept being distracted by all the re-used panels for the students off-stage... >.>
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top