I checked 134, and I think I found the panel (page 23?). Though you never censored that, even in your version it is merely a pantyless loli (or do you mean the one further down at 25? with that angle I am disinclined to google raws

). That said, I don't think there is much of a moral reason to censor it, the context is neither sensual nor sexual (upskirts at most), and particularly for the younger characters I doubt
anyone will ever think of it that way (if only that were true...).
That said, I think I made my reasoning clear that I don't complain about censorship so much as about the fact you
use a face to do it. While I easily ignore nudity normally if it isn't of a sexual kind, when I see a face then my eyes are obviously drawn there (its how human works, we look for the eye-eye-mouth pattern everywhere (at times even where there is none: Pareidolia). So I will notice it, and when I notice censorship I will have to assume it is sexual, which just makes it annoying and creepy.
I much prefer if you just blotted it out, as then it is likely to pass without even being recognized as there in the first place. So do feel free to censor, but like I said, why use a face?
