@bandito There are so many things wrong there I don't even know where to start...
First. I never said you were Dumfuckistanian, I said you SOUNDED Dumbfuckistanian. But well, good to know you're not, I guess.
Second. Whether I see her as underage or not is not the point.
Third. A 17-year-old is "underage".
Fourth. "Lolicon" comes from the term "lolita complex", with lolita in turn coming from the book "Lolita". The issue there was a middle-aged man getting infatuated with a 12yo girl. 12.
LOLICON is the attraction to girls with a CHILD'S BODY. Child. Prepubescent. Not "minors". Children. If you think our female MC there looks like a child, then I'm the one who's calling someone on you. A therapist of some sort, I guess...
If she's 16, she's a minor, but not a loli.
Even if she was flat as a board, we'd have to argue whether she's a loli or not, cause she'd be tall and her face already mature-ish looking, so DEFINITELY not a "child's body" even if she was flat. But she's not flat, so...
Also, if she's 16 she's above the age of consent in most of the world.
Now, do you wanna argue that it's wrong for a twentysomething to date a 16yo? Sure, go ahead. That's a different discussion, and one I'll probably won't take part in. But that's not the point. You said "an otaku and a lolicon", and I told you to check what a lolicon is, cause you really don't know what you're talking about...