Senryuu Shoujo - Vol. 7 Ch. 102 - A lightless Christmas 2

Can't say that was surprising for a shounen. A bit of nostalgia to make Nanako forget that that Eiji is really dumb and REALLY fucking stands out.

Although, we can either go the fluffy resolution with feelings and development, or the comedy resolution where Eiji reminds everyone how much he stands out.
 
These are premises of a “problem” lasting some chapters: Nanako will distance herself , while the other one will try to be closer with the present and stuff ; this will lead to other typical misunderstandings, like Nanako thinking “maybe she is more suited for him”, ecc...

I have faith in two things:
- both MC’s idiocy, they’ll find a way to grew closer when they realize that is Eiji the one “weird” and that stands out more
- Prez: if she learns what happened...that girl will be in SERIOUS trouble.
 
I was just telling my coworkers today that bullying is much more vicious between girls with guys we just beat each half to death and the problem's solved most of the time come to think of it that's how I made friends in school they bullied me I broke their noses then we were buds
 
Bullying between males: oppression if one side is weaker than the other, a vicious beatdown between apes is both are roughly equally strong.

Bullying between females: psychological and physical attacks.

God if women are scary
 
just what we needed in a fun, healing manga.

a monster to remind us of/advocate gleeful cruelty upon people.
 
Let's hope for that girl/snake that Koto-nee doesn't find out, 'cause you know, she's in the Modern U.S Army Combative Club and stuff.
 
If I remember correctly, Nanako could speak normally right?

After making the promise with Eiji, she communicated with others through senryuus.
 
@Superpeanut dig a 2m deep hole, put body in, fill up until around 0.5m depth, add dog carcass, fill to the top. Add rudimentary grave marker for Rex or Fluffy or Sparky on top.
 
the manga is getting dull so the author be like,"hey lets add some shit drama, cause why not?"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top