I love how there are so many 'moral high' people in the comment section acting as if they would forgive someone had it actually happened to someone close to them. I can guarantee 90% of those people chanting "muh kid muh brainwashed muh innocent" will be the first to wreck havoc. She's an innocent civilian being brainwashed, until the second she raises arms and decides to put her life in the life for her country. Is she wrong or right? I don't care. If I'm seeing it from the other nation's perspective, she is no different than a soldier regardless of sex, mental state, and gender. Denying this means just that you're so delusional because she appears in a form of underage female. If anything, she has done something more 'atrocity' than 90% of each full-fledged soldier that went to war. I love how you guys tried so hard to justify her being all innocent and all, and that everything that happened was not her fault when she went OUT OF HER WAY despite being held back to murder innocent civilians. Stop being hypocrite, will you? Are you in favor of murdering civilian or not? You can't be picking one the other only when it suits to your narrative. If you think in war everything is a GO to, then that girl's rational of revenge BECAUSE SOME CIVILIANS BECAME COLLATERAL is invalid (and this is what pushed her so far up until this chapter). If you think in war civilians should not be a casualty, then she is also guilty of this. She has killed and/or harmed and/or threatened innocent unarmed civilians with deadly weapon.