A Classic Robogirl's Love Comedy

[Ank]

lol this is going to end the same way every time isnt it?

 

[Comrade-Sandvich]

I don't see any romance....just a machine that keeps exploding

 

[HenrykDodwel]

Funny and short. What you want more?

 

[FranFran]

I want more, but it needs something besides the self-destruction gag.
It's fine with two chapters, but any more and it's going to get old and tedious really fing fast.

 

[DaGiant_18]

Goddamn Clanker

 

[Nenechu]

Definitely an interesting series. I'll be sure to keep reading

 

[gunscatter]

God I can’t wait to see who fills in for the comedy duo like in iRobot

 

[VonCesaw]

I'm pretty sure that the Laws of Robotics don't apply to anything with human-level intelligence. That, and law 3 exists too

 

[Ncararc]

Asimov had a lot of fun working out the kinks of his three laws (psychic lying robot, superiority complex robot, religious Cartesian robot, etc.), though I don't remember any of his robots being so troubled as to detonate themselves. Repeatedly. And comically.

 

[CronosusCZ]

ehmmmm

 

[astrid-202]

the lady lives........................... i`m glad .... and sad for what happens
at the end

i do hope she keeps on living so i can keep reading about her adventures

to the scanlation team, thank you for the upload,

please keep uploading until the story is complete OK

 

[Isekaijin]

If you can program sentience to that level, I'm sure you can program morality well enough not to need good ol' Asimov.

 

[astrid-202]

to <Isekaijin>

you got a good point there

hope the creator will heed your call

 

[patchouliw]

Even though her thoughts were completely different, the perspective viewers thought "at least this isn't onee x shota"

 

[Random_Passer-by]

Isaac Asimov would be proud.

 

[RWorld]

 

[versub]

There's already a page created for this title
https://mangadex.org/title/45388/a-classic-robogirl-s-love-comedy

 

[anutrix]

Add the tragedy tag?

 

[Pokari]

Ah, sentence structure. Not "a classic robogirl's love comedy", but, "a classic robogirl's love comedy".

@anutrix: Not clearly justified, to me.

Spoiler

I mean, it's obviously played for laughs. But also the circumstances are neither explained, nor apparently thought-out much (like—if we are going to approach this seriously, as something beyond the black humour gag strip aspect—why does she self-destruct dramatically and dangerously (and also thereby violating the first law) instead of just shutting down or something, plus the second chapter makes no sense unless those laws of robotics were mistranslated somewhere; the precedence of the second and third of Asimov's laws are well enough thought-out and don't create a conflict in that situation, etc).

And there are some crucial questions to be answered about some of the not-addressed bits, if we wanted to get down to hard facts, and objectively evaluate whether this is a tragedy: We have no idea what happens when she explodes. We have no idea where her intelligence is housed or whether it's proof against explosions. It's implied that she "dies", yet it's also implied that it's the same girl both times. Without resolving that I can't see it as necessarily a tragedy, even if I take everything seriously.

 

[dysperwithaperiod]

this isn’t getting another chapter, is it?