why? for one: no chaperone in both audiences (maid is in the ante chamber)
unmarried noble women of a marriage able age in a private audience with male successors of higher nobility? fat chance without a chaperone from the family of the female and that was something universal to all monarchies be it european or asian
second the first audience is highly rude by aristocracy standards as they basicly lured her out and ambushed her and then proceeded to test and prod her
that meeting alone would have been enough reason to block any further audience request it would have required a formal audience order in which case where are the rows of courtiers and royal servants?
as for third appointing any noble for a court position without the presence of the nobles house head is highly rude to the noble house doubly so if you appoint his daughter... which is why the more correct ones always say "will be appointed " , "by decree of *insert date*" or something similar because court appointment in a monarchy is a serious matter and needs to be done right