Kingdom - Vol. 59 Ch. 638 - Waterway

So fking obvious. Many users pointed this out last chapter and 2 chapters ago.
I'm just this close to drop this manga because of how unnecessarily overdramatic things have become, more than usual, over the last 15 chapters or so.
 
Are you stupid? It's obvious because every single detail is recorded history. Of course "someone" with half a brain would be able to point out after a trip to Wikipedia.
 
@okestra you are fucking retarded because 1. Not all of the unification of China is recorded in history. This event in particular is all fantasy, except for the "received support from another state" which could mean anything. 2. This is a manga. Most of it is fiction. Woah, what a shock. The author already took many liberties before, to the point that the series even contradicts history. Such as: Heki not dying in the revolt arc, Kanki not conspiring in the Chu arc to prepare to betray Qin in the future, EiSei not killing his bastard siblings in the RouAi arc, Ousen not trying to backstab Kanki then backing down in this arc, etc. This just proves how stupid and ignorant your are of Chinese history, yet trying to make excuses for the author and how mediocre his manga has become. Just a hype and overdramatic fest. Not that it wasn't like this from the start, but lately just sucks. You know what; I don't even know why I'm explaining this to you, who obviously doesn't know anything and thinks Wikipedia is enough to know about Chinese history. You are so painfully dumb, I'm wasting my time replying to you. Bye.
 
@ZombiesAreNotOkay you do realize that this is a manga with a few creative liberties but which major events are base on real events you can look most of this story on internet already...
 
@Re90 You don't say, Captain Obvious. I already explained that, but it seems my last comment was deleted by a mod.
Oh well, "received help from outside (or 'another state' according to some translations)" could mean anything. And the author handled this pretty much as 99% fiction.
But hey, I understand there are ignorant people out there (not you, I guess) who think reading something from Wikipedia is enough to know about Chinese history. Even when it's obvious not everything is recorded in world history. Even more so when there are hundreds of unreliable sources, and the only reliable one is an open and generic sentence from a scholar who just wanted to write a short annotation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top